Arguing with Jared Diamond fans might be one of the most futile activities ever conceived. Why oh why can't I keep my mouth shut and my indignities to myself? After all, he's only accused of what in the business is known as "making shit up" and "trying to get his informants killed." I can see why that should be brushed aside in light of his detailed *snerk* analysis of the facts. *chortle*
[edit]
After further discussion I withdraw my complaint about those who are fans of Diamond. I still stand by my opinions of the man, but people who read him aren't entirely lost causes. Now bevets on the other hand...
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Leeeeroy Jenkins goes to Washington
So clearly a lot has been happening in Iran, and I (like any chairborne infantry revolutionary) have lots to say about it all.
However, I'm not quite sure where to begin at the moment, it's well into the process and is (for lack of a better word) fascinating to watch, desperate to help but impotent in the face of the realities of the situation. In D.C. the same struggle with how to balance a like minded rhetorical support for any action of "the people" and to avoid undermining the legitimacy of the movement with interference from the great satan has led to a likewise...interesting situation. To sum it up I present capitol hill as presented by Leeroy Jenkins:
Obama: "OK, we need to think this through. Hillary, you get in contact with the Swiss Embassy and see what information we can get regarding the situation on the ground. Gibbs, stall for time with the press while we work out an official statement. I'll contact Gordon Brown to discuss-"
GOP: "JOOOOOOOOOOOOOHN MCCAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIN!"
Obama: "... ah, son of a-"
(courtesy of Mentat at fark.com)
P.S. If you don't know who leeroy jenkins is...well it's a WoW video, that was made for the lulz a long while back.
However, I'm not quite sure where to begin at the moment, it's well into the process and is (for lack of a better word) fascinating to watch, desperate to help but impotent in the face of the realities of the situation. In D.C. the same struggle with how to balance a like minded rhetorical support for any action of "the people" and to avoid undermining the legitimacy of the movement with interference from the great satan has led to a likewise...interesting situation. To sum it up I present capitol hill as presented by Leeroy Jenkins:
Obama: "OK, we need to think this through. Hillary, you get in contact with the Swiss Embassy and see what information we can get regarding the situation on the ground. Gibbs, stall for time with the press while we work out an official statement. I'll contact Gordon Brown to discuss-"
GOP: "JOOOOOOOOOOOOOHN MCCAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIN!"
Obama: "... ah, son of a-"
(courtesy of Mentat at fark.com)
P.S. If you don't know who leeroy jenkins is...well it's a WoW video, that was made for the lulz a long while back.
Monday, March 23, 2009
moot
So TIME has unleashed a poll onto the internet asking people to vote for the most influential people. (This isn't going to be the winner of "person of the year" mind you)
The founder of 4chan is currently winning (by a million votes at the time of this entry).
At first I was suitably shocked/disgusted at watching the /b-tards run amok on Time, and then I knowingly shook my head knowing what else would you expect from an internet poll. However, looking at the top 10 I'm not as disappointed as I thought I'd be.
Top 10:
1)moot (4chan founder)
2)Rain (Korean singer...their "Justin Timberlake" apparently and sworn enemy of Stephen Colbert)
3) Ron Paul (Ineffective political whargarbl)
4) Jon Stewart (comedian/media satirist)
5) Stephen Colbert (not as good satirist)
6) T-Pain (some producer who invented autotune to fix bad singers)
7) Morgan Tsvangirai (Ineffective opponent of Robert Mugabe about to lose his non-existant voice in Zimbabwe govt)
8) Britney Spears (has she even released an album in the last few years?)
9) Vladimir Putin (scary ass Russian KGB agent running the govt. beyond his term)
10) Arnold Schwarzenegger (yeah, the governator)
Putin is the only serious globally influential person here, Tsvangirai is really a helpless and useless voice that is ignored internationally and internally. Uhm yeah...
Jon Stewart is a semi-legitimate choice because he does occasionally put the media over the barrel and chastise them. Likewise for a significant percentage of youth do rely on the Daily Show as a source for their news intake, which is certainly a significant contribution (if not an indication of the sad level of the informed status of American youth).
It's clear that an online poll is going to skew towards the internet using audience, and going to over represent the younger and more affluent aspects of society. So who is influential to that demographic?
4chan is the originator of many many internet memes that I love dearly. Likewise it's boards do function as a true democracy (in the Greek assembly model, not our representative model). Certainly it is a bit...uhm...perverse, but that is to be expected as it is only moderated in the very slightest (removing child porn, everything else is okay). So it's kind of a wild west, but it does allow for moments of brilliance as the "collective consciousness" of the internet goes to work chasing out ideas.
Also it has porn.
So both as an example of what the internet "is," and for influencing the culture of the internet (by generating a good deal of it) there are actually worse selections among the top 10 for who actually influences the people polled...
The founder of 4chan is currently winning (by a million votes at the time of this entry).
At first I was suitably shocked/disgusted at watching the /b-tards run amok on Time, and then I knowingly shook my head knowing what else would you expect from an internet poll. However, looking at the top 10 I'm not as disappointed as I thought I'd be.
Top 10:
1)moot (4chan founder)
2)Rain (Korean singer...their "Justin Timberlake" apparently and sworn enemy of Stephen Colbert)
3) Ron Paul (Ineffective political whargarbl)
4) Jon Stewart (comedian/media satirist)
5) Stephen Colbert (not as good satirist)
6) T-Pain (some producer who invented autotune to fix bad singers)
7) Morgan Tsvangirai (Ineffective opponent of Robert Mugabe about to lose his non-existant voice in Zimbabwe govt)
8) Britney Spears (has she even released an album in the last few years?)
9) Vladimir Putin (scary ass Russian KGB agent running the govt. beyond his term)
10) Arnold Schwarzenegger (yeah, the governator)
Putin is the only serious globally influential person here, Tsvangirai is really a helpless and useless voice that is ignored internationally and internally. Uhm yeah...
Jon Stewart is a semi-legitimate choice because he does occasionally put the media over the barrel and chastise them. Likewise for a significant percentage of youth do rely on the Daily Show as a source for their news intake, which is certainly a significant contribution (if not an indication of the sad level of the informed status of American youth).
It's clear that an online poll is going to skew towards the internet using audience, and going to over represent the younger and more affluent aspects of society. So who is influential to that demographic?
4chan is the originator of many many internet memes that I love dearly. Likewise it's boards do function as a true democracy (in the Greek assembly model, not our representative model). Certainly it is a bit...uhm...perverse, but that is to be expected as it is only moderated in the very slightest (removing child porn, everything else is okay). So it's kind of a wild west, but it does allow for moments of brilliance as the "collective consciousness" of the internet goes to work chasing out ideas.
Also it has porn.
So both as an example of what the internet "is," and for influencing the culture of the internet (by generating a good deal of it) there are actually worse selections among the top 10 for who actually influences the people polled...
Friday, March 13, 2009
Battle Royale
The Daily Show today had to be one of the most awkward interviews I've ever seen.
Crash course on the background: Jon Stewart made some glib remark about CNBC cheerleading the housing bubble, contributing to the hullabaloo, not seeing the impending doom and certainly not doing any investigative reporting or watch dogging about short selling, phantom shares, and all that jazz that contributed to the collapse of some banks, and the market as a whole.
Haha, stupid media.
Then CNBC (and particularly that Mad Money guy (you know: Jim Cramer, the yelling gesticulating 'buy buy buy' guy)) took offense and lobbed some insults back and Stewart. Who skewered them back (Cramer took the attack on his network, which included him, quite personally and went on a crusade or something in the media). So tonight Stewart had Cramer on the show.
Here's what happened:
Clip 1
Clip 2
Clip 3
I have trouble making it through the whole thing it's so awkward. Basically Stewart calmly rips every excuse Cramer had apart and then really exposed what a shady character he was and how he had his hands deep in the jam pot. (Bragging about doing the short selling that he claimed to be crusading against for starters)
Ick.
I think I'm going to stick with the mattress for my money...
Crash course on the background: Jon Stewart made some glib remark about CNBC cheerleading the housing bubble, contributing to the hullabaloo, not seeing the impending doom and certainly not doing any investigative reporting or watch dogging about short selling, phantom shares, and all that jazz that contributed to the collapse of some banks, and the market as a whole.
Haha, stupid media.
Then CNBC (and particularly that Mad Money guy (you know: Jim Cramer, the yelling gesticulating 'buy buy buy' guy)) took offense and lobbed some insults back and Stewart. Who skewered them back (Cramer took the attack on his network, which included him, quite personally and went on a crusade or something in the media). So tonight Stewart had Cramer on the show.
Here's what happened:
Clip 1
Clip 2
Clip 3
I have trouble making it through the whole thing it's so awkward. Basically Stewart calmly rips every excuse Cramer had apart and then really exposed what a shady character he was and how he had his hands deep in the jam pot. (Bragging about doing the short selling that he claimed to be crusading against for starters)
Ick.
I think I'm going to stick with the mattress for my money...
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Spleling is fro chumps!
I really hadn't intended on doing nothing but post video after video...but give me a break; class just resumed and I haven't felt particularly wordy or verbose. Enjoy this kid struggle with his most amazing challenge in the spelling bee.
Monday, January 26, 2009
Sunday, January 25, 2009
Creepy
For Christmas I received many gift cards for Barnes and Noble. My extended family, meaning well, figured that now that I'm a graduate student I need more books, but (understandably) weren't going to try to navigate the waters to pick the right ones.
So I decided to purchase a couple books that I "should" have in my infant library: Squier and Davis's Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley (the first really good examination of mounds and the first Smithsonian publication) as well as Noble's Stone Age Spear and Arrow points of the Midcontinental and Eastern United States...pretty much the standard text to begin with projectile point identification. Anyhow the details of what I'm buying are immaterial.
Upon using my Barnes and Noble giftcard to purchase some books I noticed something upon reading the card no.
xxxxxx427198325 (I don't want you all using the last 10 bucks on it)
So a card, purchased from a random store, plucked from the rack, ended in my DOB and age (April 27, 1983...25 years old)...
I'm not really a conspiracy theorist or a numerologist, but that's just creepy...
Should I be scared? I know I recently went off on some scathing commentary on our former president, but how long had this conspiracy been in place to track my book purchases through the proxy of a gift from my grandparents?
So I decided to purchase a couple books that I "should" have in my infant library: Squier and Davis's Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley (the first really good examination of mounds and the first Smithsonian publication) as well as Noble's Stone Age Spear and Arrow points of the Midcontinental and Eastern United States...pretty much the standard text to begin with projectile point identification. Anyhow the details of what I'm buying are immaterial.
Upon using my Barnes and Noble giftcard to purchase some books I noticed something upon reading the card no.
xxxxxx427198325 (I don't want you all using the last 10 bucks on it)
So a card, purchased from a random store, plucked from the rack, ended in my DOB and age (April 27, 1983...25 years old)...
I'm not really a conspiracy theorist or a numerologist, but that's just creepy...
Should I be scared? I know I recently went off on some scathing commentary on our former president, but how long had this conspiracy been in place to track my book purchases through the proxy of a gift from my grandparents?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)